Skip to main content

Guest blog

Latest blog posts

Reconsidering Asylum: Is it for those who need protection?

By Devyani Prabhat, Raawiyah Rifath, Reuven (Ruvi) Ziegler, Alex Powell and Natalie Sedacca, Border Criminologies,
In a recent workshop, funded by the Society of Legal Scholars, several legal practitioners, NGOs, policy experts and legal scholars in the field of asylum and nationality studies came together to analyse the asylum related provisions of the new Nationality and Borders Act 2022 ('the Act…

Global Business Mobility Routes

By Gemma Tracey, Latitude Law,
11 April 2022 saw the introduction of the new Global Business Mobility routes (GBM) into the UK's immigration system. GBM is a new set of sponsored routes to assist overseas businesses with establishing a presence in, or transferring workers to, the UK.The GBM routes replace previous…

The “unduly harsh” test considered further by Court of Appeal

By Caspar Latham, UK Human Rights Blog,
The question of how to determine whether or not the deportation of a foreign national convicted of criminal offending is a disproportionate interference in the family life that they may share with their partner or child has been explored in a series of cases, including the leading…

Why the UK-Rwanda Asylum Deal Risks Harming Global Standards

By Heaven Crawley, United Nations University Centre for Policy Research,
Professor Heaven Crawley reflects on the newly announced asylum partnership agreement between the UK and Rwanda and its implications for and ramifications on global standards on refugees and asylum-seekers. On 14 April, while the British Parliament was on holiday for Easter, UK Home…

Outsourcing asylum seekers: the case of Rwanda and the UK

By Cristiano d'Orsi via The Conversation,
UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced on April 14 2022 that Britain would relocate some asylum seekers arriving in the UK to Rwanda. The plan was condemned by the opposition as well as human rights groups such as Amnesty International. The UK has settled on Rwanda after earlier…

Anything Goes? The Permissive Approach of the ECtHR towards Deprivation of Nationality and Subsequent Expulsion in the Fight against Terrorism

By Maria Martha Gerdes and Samuel Hartwig, Verfassungsblog,
Last month, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled in the case of Johansen v. Denmark on the deprivation of nationality and expulsion due to terrorist offences. The Court rejected the applicant's complaint of an infringement of his right to private and family life under Art. 8…

Wrongfully removed Afghan child wins Francovich damages

By Asad Ali Khan,
QH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 421 (01 April 2022) The Court of Appeal has held that a mere declaration was not just satisfaction for the SSHD's admitted violations of the rights—pursuant to article 8 of the ECHR—of a minor Afghan asylum…

About the guest blog

  EIN's guest blog is intended as a platform where we gather together some of the best of immigration law blogging.

And it is a platform where you are welcome to post your opinions, commentary or analysis on immigration and asylum law.

Creating a blog post. Image credit: pixelcreatures @ Pixabay https://pixabay.com/photos/cms-wordpress-265127/

Blogging on EIN is a way of ensuring your opinions are available to read on one of the UK's leading immigration law websites.

Disclaimer

The EIN guest blog is provided for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice.

Any views expressed in the EIN guest blog are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of EIN.

The publication of posts from, or links to, other organisations and companies on the EIN guest blog does not constitute an endorsement or approval by EIN of the organisation or company, nor their products or services.