Skip to main content

Chief Inspector of the UKBA says 'migration refusal pool' of over 150,000 cases is a "national problem"

Summary
Inspector finds UKBA has no "clear strategy" for dealing with a group of more than 150,000 foreign nationals staying on after their visas expire
By EIN
Date of Publication:
05 July 2012

A new report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration has found that a "significant backlog" of those refused further leave to remain is a "national problem", the Daily Telegraph has reported.

According to BBC News, the inspector says UKBA has no "clear strategy" for dealing with the group of more than 150,000 foreign nationals staying on after visas expire.

John Vine said the group, typically foreign students, is growing in number.

The Telegraph says that the inspector's report was examining the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Immigration Team, but made public for the first time the scale of something called the Migration Refusal Pool – a list of cases where workers or students have been refused leave to remain in the country after their original visas expired.

The press release issued by the Chief Inspector, with a link to the report, is below:

The Chief Inspector publishes a report on the Hampshire & Isle of Wight Immigration Team

The Hampshire & Isle of Wight Local Immigration Team was the first to be established in the UK in 2008. This inspection was broad ranging but particularly focussed on how effective the LIT was in managing asylum casework and identifying and removing immigration offenders from the UK.

The Chief Inspector was pleased to find that:

• the LIT was exceeding its target for removals, in particular those likely to cause harm;

• asylum decisions were generally made within the 30 day target, well above the national average; and

• the Arrest Team operations were conducted professionally and all those encountered were treated with dignity and respect.

However, the Chief Inspector was concerned to find that:

• there is a pool of over 150,000 cases nationally where a decision had been made by the Agency to refuse an extension of stay, but where it was not known whether these individuals had left the UK, nor was there a strategic plan to manage these cases;

• the location and removal of absconders was considered low priority for the Agency; and

• the effectiveness of the intelligence used to support arrest visits was not measured to ensure an efficient use of resources.

John Vine, Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration said "This was my first inspection of a Local Immigration Team office, and I chose Hampshire & Isle of Wight as it was the first such office to be created.

"I was impressed with the management of the office including how the work was managed so that the LIT exceeded its removal targets. Asylum decisions were made promptly in the majority of cases, and there was a good relationship with local MPs and social services. Arrest team visits were well-organised and people were seen to be treated with dignity and respect.

"However, we did find that there are over 150,000 cases nationally of migrants who have been refused an extension of stay in the UK. The Agency does not know how many of these individuals have left the country or who are waiting to be removed. I also saw no evidence that there is a clear plan in place for the Agency to deal with this stream of work to ensure this does not become another backlog.

Download this report as a pdf here:

An inspection of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Local Immigration Team